Ruotsissa vaarallinen H1N1-rokote riksdagin käsiteltäväksi

Tässä google-englantia versio, suomalainen tulossa, kunhan valmistuu...

Committee on the Constitution KU Stockholm 2009-11-23
Swedish Parliament
Permanent Secretary Bertil Wennberg
100 12 Stockholm

Request for bringing proposals to review the government's handling of swine flu and pandemic vaccine ditto. Leif Arnold have the honor equally to Chapter 3. § 7-day nationwide scheme to solicit that the Constitutional Committee by the committee's report raises the proposal in parliament on the investigation of
The government's handling of swine flu and pandemic vaccine ditto (its initiative) on the following grounds.
Requests have also been submitted to the Parliamentary Ombudsman on the investigation of the Social Welfare Board, infectious Protection Institute, Office for Civil Contingencies and Drug Administration's handling of the case. Under the special provisions thereon, JO and KU should coordinate its investigation.

1. Declaration of Helsinki Helsinki Declaration was developed and adopted in 1964 by the World
Medical Association, WMA. The declaration is not a legally binding document of international law, but deserves full authority by codifying or influence in Swedish law and regulation in Sweden.
The current Swedish vaccination campaign does not comply with the Helsinki Declaration and the regulation of ethics in medical research where people are involved. The government and authorities have on several television appearance said, inter alia, that "The vaccine is of course an entirely new vaccine
now be developed, so there has never been tested in real life "," this is the first time in history that we have the opportunity to "protective effect of the vaccine is unknown, but we think". Such guesses and assumptions, which therefore do not rest on scientifically guaranteed basis, shall not be tolerated by the Swedish
Parliament.

Charlott Bergqvist at the MPA talking about studying and learning and that those now in progress. Moreover, says Charlotte Bergqvist "We have no data yet" "we await further study results within the next month".
Furthermore: The SPC Pandemrix talks about studies that are particularly interested in reactions that are fatal, life-threatening side effects, adverse reactions and adverse events of special interest.
In addition, the County Council passed the information that only serious and unusual
suspected adverse reactions should be reported. Furthermore, announces that the County Council reports on children and pregnant women, is of special interest. The government has thus allowed the manufacturer, Glaxo Smith Kline (GSK) to carry out large-scale pharmaceutical controlled studies on unwitting citizens in Sweden.
2nd Policy fighting supply Appeal recently in the Court refused the extradition of the Glaxo Agreement because of alleged trade secrets and the public interest. The sentence is under appeal
to the Supreme Administrative Court.
3rd Individual rights
Further, according to research ethics policy, the individual, in principle, be warned that he or she participates in a research project, even if the study is completely safe for the individual. The reason is respect for personal integrity and the fundamental requirement of respect for persons.
The requirement of respect for individuals' privacy is also supported by the Swedish constitution.
Alleged, and so far unsupported evidence of the pandemic, with lousy logistics and produced queue-panic, can under no circumstances lead to the government may violate research ethics policy,
Declaration of Helsinki and the Swedish Constitution.
4th Other government's crime research study was preceded by intensive and unlikely finished propaganda. Therefore is not participating in the vaccination campaign by an informed and voluntary decision, which is in violation of the WMA.
Furthermore, the throughput speeds that stated there are no reasonable opportunities for staff to ensure that each patient has received the comprehensive information that the rules require that his decision to ansesvälinformerat, and Constitutional Committee should consider as a violation of Nuremberg Code's requirements ie. voluntary informed consent.
WMA also requires informed consent. Informed consent (informed
consent) mean that the patient is aware of the potential dangers that
patient is exposed to and the option to either receive placebo or drug. Children also have the right to informed consent. However, the government neglected to provide children with age appropriate information.
Government must be deemed to have breached research ethics policy when you have used phrases such as "offered". According to its statutes ethical practices should be used "asks" and not "offered". The latter verb implies that it is a privilege to participate and can thus hide that participation can also involve risks and discomfort.
5th Lack of patient safety standards
All medicines, including vaccines should be tested safe and effective for the applicable set of safety and efficiency standards. Without that test security can not find that the benefits outweigh the risks or that the vaccine is safe or effective. Safety behind this vaccine
Pandemrix based on inadequate studies, and insufficient scientific evidence that the vaccine was / is safe to give to people. It has been claimed that the pandemic vaccine Pandemrix is safe to give to children, pregnant women and the rest of the Swedish population. It also claims to be pregnant vaccine provides an indirect protection to the child when it's newborn. It appears that the SPC:
"Experience is very limited in children between 3 and 9 years and there is no experience in children younger than 3 years or in children and adolescents 10-17 years" and "There is currently no data on the use of Pandemrix during pregnancy."
In other words, experience is entirely absent or was very limited when it started to mass vaccination against swine flu.
6th Lack of testing in pregnant
We have previously had a policy of not assign pregnant medication during pregnancy, just because the risks to the baby is too big. In this case, the government has abandoned these principles. The vaccine is also never tested on pregnant women. The government claims that it has a risk / benefit assessment, it has been alleged that "the benefits outweigh the risks." Available scientific literature indicates something quite different. Shortened production: by stimulating a pregnant woman's immune system during the middle of or during the latter part of pregnancy significantly increased the risk that the child may develop in childhood autism or schizophrenia during adolescence or beyond.
Athletes: September Smith et al. Maternal immune activation alters fetal brain development through interleukin-6. Journal of Neuroscience 2007; 27: 10695-10702.
The risks of this vaccine are enormous for the fetus. In statistical terms, calculated as the risk of a pregnant woman being hospitalized because of a swine influenza infection 1 in 300 000 pregnant women. Government uses common sense in their argument? In statistical terms, the risks of the vaccine 100%
risky at 1 pregnant woman and swine influenza in itself poses a risk of less than 0.32% per 100 000 pregnant women ending up in hospital.
7th Risks for young children
MPA announced 2009-11-12 that all children under 3 years should be vaccinated against swine flu. The decision is based on a new study of 51 children younger than three years and the experience thus far has been to vaccinate children between 3 and 6 years, and children under three years who belong to one division and vaccinated with a vaccine against swine flu. Furthermore, the MPA announced that "The survey shows that even the younger children get a good protection of this vaccine and that there is no other side effects than in older children."
The studies you refer to are insufficient, then it can only refer to the adverse reactions have been demonstrated in recent months. We have therefore no idea about side effects and its extent. The long-term damage caused by the vaccine is also unknown. One of several components that are clearly inappropriate as a component of this vaccine is ethylmercury, which is converted in the body to inorganic mercury and therefore can damage including brain cells, especially in developing stage in fetuses and young children. Ethylmercury can be easier to travel through the blood / brain barrier, and consequently face it easier in the brain.
In July 2009 published a research report which also showed severe cell damage by thiomersal. Research report, which is unobjectionable, revealed the following: mitochondria damaged so badly that they do not function normally anymore, the body's protection against free radicals deteriorate, celldegenerering and cell death.
The government has apparently apart even from this report. It had to exclude thiomersal in the vaccine, but because of government greed commissioned yet a vaccine containing thiomersal. I am amazed the government's lack of knowledge, and even more over the government's lack of concern about the possible long-term damage caused by this vaccine.
Furthermore, the same day that the MPA took the decision, died in a two year old in Finland, although H1N1 vaccination against swine flu. According to news release from the hospital district HNS became sick child at the beginning of the week. Last Wednesday was a child in care. It had been a week since the child vaccinated against H1N1. The aforementioned death, I believe demonstrates that the vaccine does not provide a secure protection for children under 3 years and that death can not be excluded among children who are vaccinated against swine flu. As usual, explained away his death with "The exact cause of death is unknown."
8th Implications for healthy people
I also take this opportunity to extend my observations to provide influenza vaccine to healthy subjects. In the long term is a naturally acquired immunity, following completion of flu the best protection, why should we deprive the citizens the best protection? The alleged savings that are now alleged to be doing by the mass vaccination of the Swedish population, will only lead to the shooting problem and the cost in front of him. My reasoning is confirmed by the city epidemiologist Annika Linde and her statement in Nyhetsmorgon: "By having a lot of influenza infections through life has been helping to build this immunity" for all diseases, it is better for the long-lasting immunity to a natural infection than to be vaccinated "" We now have a much better vaccine than the traditional flu vaccine, which should provide a longer immunity and, at worst, we'll provide a syringe and, in order to maintain this immunity. "
A significant factor has been omitted in any discussion concerning vaccine among children and infants is that you know that vaccination may mean that these individuals do not receive a relatively mild manner. So it is a significant price you risk paying long-term to short-sighted attempt to protect them against flu.
9th Other government irregularities and shortcomings.
The government claims that it is mainly young healthy individuals affected by the flu. It is an incorrect statement. The epidemiological study published August 20, 2009 and was conducted by the French institute for public health (Institut de Veille Sanitaire InVS) showed otherwise.
The number of swine flu cases around the world is hyper-inflated. I would also note that KU WHO during the trip again amended the definition of what a pandemic is. It has removed "a large number of dead and sick" the new definition can therefore fit into the ordinary
seasonal influenza.
The government has failed in emergency preparedness, which is not imposed travel restrictions, not built quarantine at airports, no infrared cameras were installed, etc.. It was pure luck that the flu (pandemic) and the spread of infection and mortality was not worse. Do we have the same luck next time?
10th Requests
Committee on the Constitution should be on his own initiative now, without delay examine the government by their responsible minister violated those rules by directly and explicitly involved in the decision by the authorities and the planning of the vaccination campaign.
I would therefore, in light of this, the Committee on the Constitution through its initiatives in the committee report examines government and its handling of swine flu and pandemic vaccine ditto. This is an emergency notification and is a matter of significant public importance.
I urge to be heard as a witness in the Committee on the Constitution.
Stockholm as above
Leif Arnold c / o Center for Environmental and Energy Research Sweden AB
PO Box 201 03
161 02 BROMMA
Ehdota parempaa käännöstä

Menee vähän ohi asiasta, mutta vahvasti lääketeollisuuteen liittyvä asia, koska se koskee lääkkeitä.Kärsin aika moisesta kroonisesta unettomuudesta tällä elämänrytmillä eli työ 8-16.

Olen yöihminen.

Nyt määrätty unilääke on hupaisa/vaarallinen. Miten unta"auttava" lääke voi olla näin vaarallinen?

Otetaan vain mahdolliset haittavaikutukset, muu kama on K-18.

raajojen kylmyys/tunnottomuus
väsymys
uupumus
huimaus
päänsärky
pahoinvointi
oksentelu
ripuli
vatsakipu
ummetus

Jos noistä osan edes saat niin miten nukut?

Ollankohan hakoteillä?

Testasin näitä lääkkeitä ja teho oli se, että nukahdin n. 6 aamulla ja heräsin 16-18 illalla. Eikä puuupuuu toiminut kahteen päivään.

Sitten elin taas oman rytmini mukaan. Olen yö ihminen. Voin paljon paremmin ja nukun päivällä kuin kissani Hessu hyvin makoisasti.

Ihmisen oma rytmi on tärkeä ja väitän, että se on suuri osa ihmisten pahoivointia määrätä heidät toimimaan ympäristössä ja ajassa jossa eivät voi hyvin.

Esim. 8-16 työaika. Monia töitä voi tehdä jo etänä ja edelleen odotellessa sitä IT vallankumousta, odotan että ihmiset voivat hoitaa työnsä myös omalle sopivalleen ajalleen, kunhan työt tehdään.